Back

Sope Creek Elementary School (2017)

Marietta, GA

Academic Achievement
Anger Management
Behavioral Issues
Bullying
Character Education
Conflict Resolution
Diversity
Mental Health

Closing the Gap

Sope Creek Closing-the-Gap Results Report Narrative:



Our Closing-the-Gap goal is aligned with our school and district priorities. In order to successfully complete an academic year, fifth grade students must meet standards in reading and math, as documented by their report card grades. Research shows that interventions addressing school success behaviors increase student achievement (Bleuer, J., Palomares, S., & Waltz, G.R. 1993. "Activities for Counseling Underachievers"; Harvey, V.S. & Chickie-Wolfe, L. (2007). "Fostering Independent Learning: Practical Strategies to Promote Student Success". The 11 students that we identified were not meeting these standards in one or more subjects, and were receiving failing grades as well as low marks in the work/study habits section of their report cards. Interventions were planned to address improving work study habits as a means to improve grades in order to close the gap between the students who were failing and those who were receiving passing grades.



After collaborating with school stakeholders, we planned 9 weekly 30 minute small group sessions using research-based best practices in the areas of effective school, study, and test-taking behaviors. Our objective was to provide emotional and behavioral support with a focus on school success to the 11 identified students. Our goal was to close the gap by increasing the GPAs of these students by 20%, as well as increasing the number of our target group who achieved a satisfactory grade (“S”) in work/study habits on their third 9-week report cards by 20%.



This small group intervention was based on the ASCA domains, mindsets and behaviors which supported the desired student outcomes. Curriculum aligned with the Academic, Career, and Social/Emotional domains of the ASCA Comprehensive Model, and was planned to be developmentally appropriate. Because we wanted to improve grades and work/study habits, group sessions included research based instruction (cited above) in: school success behaviors and attitudes, listening, tips for becoming organized at home and school, understanding learning styles, successful homework practices, creating a Study Buddy container for supplies, understanding test anxiety, coping with anxiety, and test-taking skills .



A review of process, perception, and achievement/achievement-related post data indicates that this intervention led to many improvements. An examination of the Closing the Gap Results Report which accompanies this section did not reveal a positive change in student beliefs, but knowledge, and skills did increase. The perception data summary is included as a separate uploaded document.





The results of this closing the gap project indicate improvement in student GPAs and work/study habits. While the students began the project with very positive attitudes as measured by the perception data, several appeared to become discouraged during the course of the project. We did, however, see improvement in several areas of knowledge and skills. Attitudes actually decreased slightly. It should be noted that several students were on Tier 3 and referred for psychoeducational testing during this time period. Because of that, we were pleased to see the growth in GPAs by 14%. There was a greater improvement in work/study habits (50%) indicating carry over into the classroom subsequent to group interventions .



Our results indicated that at-risk students benefit from a combined approach involving a closing the gap intervention such as this, the RTI (Response to Intervention) process, and academic support from other staff members (tutoring). We will continue to provide similar interventions to academically at-risk students in the future, extending the intervention to include fourth graders.

Goal: By the end of the third 9 week grading period, increase GPAs and the number of students achieving an “S” (Satisfactory) in work/study habits of academically at-risk 5th grade students by 20% as compared to the second 9 week grading period. This leads to an increase in happiness at school.

Target Group: 11 at-risk 5th grade students failing at least one academic area on their second 9 week report cards

Data Used to Identify Students: Report card grades and teacher recommendation

School Counselor(s): Jennifer Frederick, Lisa Hunt, Claire Murphy

ASCA Domain, Mindsets & Behaviors Standard(s): ASCA Mindset and Behavior Standard(s) and Domain(s): Academic Mindsets: 2 (Self-confidence in ability to succeed) and 6 (Positive attitude toward work and learning Behavior: Learning Strategies 3, 4, 8 (use time management, organizational and study skills; apply self-motivation and self-direction to learning; actively engage in challenging coursework Behavior: Self-Management Skills 6, 8 (demonstrate ability to overcome barriers to learning; demonstrate the ability to balance school, home and community activities)

Type of Activities to be Delivered in What Manner?: The counselors at Sope Creek facilitated 9 small group sessions over a period of 9 weeks with 11 academically at-risk fifth grade students who had failed at least one subject on their second 9 week report card. Each session focused on various aspects of school success: agenda usage, organization, listening, being prepared for school and tests, learning styles, study caddies, test anxiety, test-taking tips, and study skills. Pre and post perception data was collected as well as report card grades.

Process Data (Number of students affected): 11 Fifth grade academically at risk students met for nine 30 minute small group sessions.

Perception Data (Surveys or assessments used): Counselor generated pre/post test What did these students believe? How many students believed they could bring up a failing grade? Pre: 11 Post: 11 (0% change) How many students believed that using study skills and test taking strategies could help them do better in school? Pre: 11 Post: 10 (9% decrease) How many students wanted to have better grades on their report card? Pre: 11 Post: 10 (9% decrease) What did students know? How many students knew 3 behaviors that showed good listening? Pre: 5 Post: 7 (40% increase) How many students knew what to do if they couldn’t answer a test question? Pre: 2 Post: 7 (250% increase) How many students knew to be wary of “sometimes” and “always” statements in multiple choice questions? Pre: 5 Post: 10 (100% increase) How many students identified good organization skills? Pre: 8 Post: 10 (25% increase) How many students knew 4 different tips for remembering information? Pre: 6 Post: 7 (17% increase) What did students do? How many students went to correct school helpers? Pre: 5 Post: 7 (40% increase) How many students had a time management plan? Pre:3 Post:6 (100% increase) How many students wrote assignments in their agendas? Pre: 7 Post: 10 (43% increase) How many students used 4 useful strategies for following written directions? Pre: 7 Post: 8 (14% increase) How many students used good pre-testing behaviors? Pre: 4 Post: 8 (100% increase) How many students used helpful testing strategies? Pre: 4 Post: 7 (75% increase) How many students used proven homework strategies? Pre: 4 Post: 4 (0% change)

Outcome Data (Achievement, attendance, and/or behavior data): Comparison of report card GPA data between the 2nd and 3rd grading periods: Pre: GPA 2.5 Post: GPA 2.85 (14% increase) Comparison of work/study habit grades between the 2nd and 3rd grading periods (S=Satisfactory). Pre: 4 had Ss Post: 6 had Ss (50% increase)

Implications: The results of this closing the gap project indicated improvement in student GPAs and work/study habits. While the students began the project with very positive attitudes as measured by perception data, several appeared to become discouraged during the course of the project. We did see improvement in several areas of knowledge and skills. Attitudes actually decreased slightly. It should be noted that several students were on Tier 3 and referred for psychoeducational testing during this time period. Because of that, we were pleased to see the growth in GPAs by 14%. There was a greater improvement in work/study habits (50%) indicating carry over into the classroom subsequent to group interventions. Our results indicated that at risk students benefit from a combined approach involving a closing the gap intervention such as this, the RTI (Response to Intervention) process, and academic support from other school staff members (tutoring). In the future we will continue to provide similar interventions to academically at-risk students.

Attachments


Word
Download

Word
Download

Word
Download

Word
Download

Word
Download