Back

Mauldin Elementary School (2017)

Simpsonville, SC

School Counseling Core Curriculum Results Report

Our educational community is very devoted to fostering problem-solving skills. The Profile of the South Carolina Graduate lists problem-solving as a critical need. Our school mission statement is dedicated to producing students who “persevere in seeking solutions.” Our School Counseling Program Mission and Vision statements align with our state, district, and school and their commitments to instill problem-solving strategies and skills within our students. Problem-solving is important to the development of the whole child in terms of their academic, mental, emotional, and social well-being. Students with the ability to solve problems are independent, critical-thinkers who can overcome challenges.
After Christmas break, the school counselors attended a Kindergarten grade level meeting to collaborate on how to continue to serve our kindergarten students and help them prepare for first grade. During this meeting, there was much discussion on the inability of kindergartners to solve their own problems more than any other year in the past. As counselors, we ask clarifying questions to decipher if these were problems with key individuals, small groups of students, or the whole grade level. Unanimously, teachers agreed that their entire class needed help cultivating these skills. The counselors took this feedback and debriefed. We consulted with our ASCA Mindsets & Behaviors for Kindergarten students, our goals for the year, and our curriculum.
During the month of January, the counselors planned a four-lesson unit to address problem-solving strategies and skills. This aligned well with our second goal, to reduce bus behavior referrals. We decided to deliver core curriculum as a strategy for achieving that goal. The lesson unit for kindergarten included lessons on the Problem-Solving Star method using bus scenarios for the S:stop, T:think, A:act, and R:review steps. We discussed the Circle of Control and examples of what we can and cannot control on the bus. One lesson was devoted to Habit #1: Be Proactive, specifically how to control ourselves, our words, our actions, and our behaviors when we are angry. Finally, we addressed worries and how to cope with our worries appropriately using tools and techniques for problem-solving.
We measured the effectiveness of these lessons in a couple of different ways. At the beginning of each lesson, we used a Know, Want to Know, Learned chart (KWL) to collect perception data and assess what students already know, what they need to know, and what they learned. The KWL charts not only informed counselors of what the students learned during that particular lesson, but also what they retained from the lesson before.
We collected outcome data by using one Kindergarten’s class agendas. Each day, students receive a color in their agenda that corresponds with their behavior for the day. Pink is Exceptional, Purple is Above Average, Green is Good, Yellow is Below Average, Orange is Not Good, Red is a Terrible day, and Blue is an Office Referral. The counselors tracked students’ behavior data during the months of February, March and April to evaluate whether our lessons impacted students’ daily behavior. The behavior data showed that in February 68% of students scored above average (Pink or Purple), the percentage increased in March to 85% above average (Pink or Purple), and in May 91% of students achieved above average (Pink or Purple) ratings. We also closely monitored the bus behavior referrals after this unit. Our data shows that out of 58 total bus referrals for kindergarten students, only 16 referrals (25%) occurred after this problem-solving unit began in February.
Our perception, outcome, and teacher referral data indicated that the problem-solving unit was very successful. In the future, the counselors will present this unit earlier in the year for behavior prevention. It will benefit students to learn these strategies earlier in the year so they can begin applying them as soon as possible. As an additional service, teachers recommended individual students who were still struggling to participate in a Problem-Solving Small group. This is a service that we will continue to provide for those that need more intensive intervention. In the future, the counselors would like to collaborate with the classroom teachers on collecting more individualized perception data rather than a group chart. Collecting individual perception data for a kindergarten class can be developmentally difficult as five year olds' struggle to read or write on their own. This is an area of improvement, but overall the unit, content, and data proved to be very beneficial for our kindergarten students.

Grade Level: Kindergarten

Lesson Topic: Problem Solving

Lesson was Presented in Which Class/Subject:

ASCA Domain, Mindsets & Behaviors Standard(s): Social/Emotional Domain M2; B- LS 2- Demonstrate Creativity B- SMS 7- Demonstrate effective coping skills when faced with a problem

Start/End: Feb. 1-15, 2017

Process Data (Number of students affected): 6 Kindergarten Classes; approximately 25 students per class; 155 students total; 30 minute class periods.

Perception Data (Surveys or assessments used): At the end of the unit, we had 3 KWL Charts indicating that by the end of the unit students learned, understood, and could use and apply:
1. Circle of Control- what we can and cannot control
2. Problem-Solving STAR method
3. Strategies for coping with Anger and Worries
4. Appropriate vs. Inappropriate behavior Choices
5. Creative solutions for independently solving problems.

Outcome Data (Achievement, attendance, and/or behavior data): Outcome data collected from 1 Kindergarten Class’s Daily Behavior report concluded the following: March: 269 out of 397 total behavior reports were Above Average (Pink or Purple). While 25 reports were below average (yellow, orange, or red). 68% of behavior was above average. April: 405 out of 478 total behavior reports were above average (pink or purple). While 19 of the 478 were below average behavior reports (yellow, orange, or red). 85% of behavior was above average. May: 436 out of 482 total behavior reports were above average (Pink or Purple). While only 9 out of 482 were below average behavior reports. 91% of behavior was above average. Outcome data for Program Goal #2: Decreasing bus behavior referrals In May 2016, we had 505 total behavior referrals, 331 of those referrals were bus referrals. Approximately 65% of referrals were bus related. In May 2017, we had 543 total behavior referrals, 248 of those referrals were bus referrals. Approximately 45% of referrals were bus related. Our goal was to decrease bus referrals by 20% (264 total), we exceeded our goal decreased behavior referrals by 25%. We also decreased the percentage of bus referrals from the total number of behavior referrals by 20% (65% in 2016 to 45% in 2017)

Implications: The data indicates that the Problem Solving Unit had a favorable outcome in both perception and outcome data. This year, more than any previous year, the Kindergarten teachers expressed a concern for the lack of independence and problem-solving ability displayed by their students. This was a trend in all classes. After each lesson, the teachers reported that they had been reinforcing the lesson, practicing with their students, and referring the students to the charts that we created in class with our strategies on them. The teacher reinforcement most definitely impacted the success of the lesson, the retention for the children, and increase in their skills and behavior. Counselors will encourage teachers to reinforce all School Counseling lessons in an effort to reap these same positive results. Teachers reported that students were showing tremendous amounts of improvement for the remainder of the school year. Collecting perception data at the kindergarten level is often challenging. Developmentally, not all of the students are capable of verbally expressing their thoughts and feelings. We rely heavily on the teachers to help us the data aspect. Since students are not able to write or complete survey, most perception data is done as a class using anchor charts or KWL charts that allow us to see what they have learned during the lesson. Perception data and teacher reports identified some students who were struggling with Problem-Solving, confidence, and being independent. As a result, a small group was created as a booster for these 5 students who were not retaining and applying the information as well as their classmates. The Small Group and individual attention appeared to help these students greatly. The outcome data indicated that positive student behavior was steadily increasing after we started the Problem-Solving Unit. Comments in the student’s agendas showed that students were using some of the strategies that we were learning in our lesson and applying them in class. The teachers also commented on their independence and problem-solving abilities in the agenda notes for their parents to read and initial. This unit was an intervention based on mostly teacher, but some parent reports. Problem-solving, confidence, and independence had been an issue throughout the entire school year. An earlier intervention would have been ideal. We did not start this unit until the end of February after receiving the mid-year feedback from teachers. In the future, School Counselors will try to identify these pervasive needs and apply intervention as soon as possible to help students have a successful school year. Our perception and outcome data indicated that these problem-solving lessons were very beneficial for the kindergarten level. Their behavior results and teacher reports implied that we should continue to do these lessons in the future.

Attachments


File
Download

Grade Level: Kindergarten

Lesson Topic: Problem Solving- Tattling

Lesson was Presented in Which Class/Subject:

ASCA Domain, Mindsets & Behaviors Standard(s): Social/Emotional Domain M2; B- LS 2- Demonstrate Creativity B- SMS 7- Demonstrate effective coping skills when faced with a problem

Start/End: Feb. 15-28, 2017

Process Data (Number of students affected): 6 Kindergarten Classes; approximately 25 students per class; 155 students total; 30 minute class periods.

Perception Data (Surveys or assessments used): See Lesson 1. This lesson is a part of a 4 lesson unit.

Outcome Data (Achievement, attendance, and/or behavior data): See Lesson 1. This lesson is a part of a 4 lesson unit.

Implications: See Lesson 1. This lesson is a part of a 4 lesson unit.

Attachments


File
Download

Grade Level: Kindergarten

Lesson Topic: Problem-Solving: Coping with Anger

Lesson was Presented in Which Class/Subject:

ASCA Domain, Mindsets & Behaviors Standard(s): Social/Emotional Domain M2; B- LS 2- Demonstrate Creativity B- SMS 7- Demonstrate effective coping skills when faced with a problem

Start/End: March 2017

Process Data (Number of students affected): 6 Kindergarten Classes; approximately 25 students per class; 155 students total; 30 minute class periods.

Perception Data (Surveys or assessments used): See Lesson 1. This lesson is a part of a 4 lesson unit.

Outcome Data (Achievement, attendance, and/or behavior data): See Lesson 1. This lesson is a part of a 4 lesson unit.

Implications: See Lesson 1. This lesson is a part of a 4 lesson unit.

Attachments


Word
Download

Excel
Download

File
Download