Back

South Junior High School (2018)

Boise, ID

Closing the Gap

South counselors developed academic, behavioral, and attendance data profiles for the 15-16 school year. Behaviorally, male students were responsible for nearly 70% of referrals for violent, aggressive, or unsafe behavior. Academically, 70% of students who failed to earn a GPA of 2.0 or above for the 15-16 school year were male. Furthermore, male students receiving special education services were failing to earn a GPA of 2.0 or above at a significantly higher rate than their peers who were not on Individualized Education Plans. Of the 39 students on I.E.P.’s who failed to meet the 2.0 requirement during the 15-16 school year, 30 were male. Thus, while overall the student services team was concerned for the extent to which our male students were struggling behaviorally and academically, the gap in academic performance between male students on I.E.P.s and that of their peers was simply too large to not address if we are to fulfil our vision of ALL students finding significance in their contributions that improve our world.



Working collaboratively with South’s three grade-level special education teachers, special education department chair, and four paraprofessionals, myriad interventions were developed and/or improved upon at the start of the 16-17 school year. A behavioral reinforcement system (Bobcat Cards) was implemented, the Study Skills class curriculum underwent revisions to more closely follow our school-wide AVID model, and additional trainings on accommodations versus modifications were delivered to all staff. Further interventions were informed by a student needs assessment and included individual coaching on how students could best use their Infinite Campus portal to monitor grades and missing assignments, weekly incentives for students with zero missing assignments, technical guidance for parents to set up their Infinite Campus portals and district supported trainings for paraprofessionals to refine in-class instructional support.



At the end of semester one of the 16-17 school year academic summaries were developed and the performance of male students on I.E.P.’s was reviewed. Significant improvement in the academic performance of the class of 2020 (9th grade for 16-17 school year) was achieved. Similar levels of improvement were not evident for 7th or 8th grade students. Counselors held informal discussions with multiple students in the target group at the end of semester one. It became evident that additional academic and organizational interventions would be not be effective if student hope, as defined by Snyder (1994) was not improved. Therefore, in an effort to close the gap within a gap that had emerged and to more clearly quantify the direct impact of an intervention delivered by a school counselor, individual counseling session plans were developed for 7th and 8th grade students in the target group. The submitted Closing the Gap Results Report documents the outcomes and implications of an individual counseling intervention guided by Hope Theory (Snyder, 2000) delivered to 8th grade students. Additional interventions tied to the results report included the student and counselor calling home weekly to update on academic progress and a lunch incentive for any student with zero missing assignments at the end of quarter three.



Unfortunately, the results report goal was not met. While the number of 8th grade males receiving special education services earning a GPA of 2.0 or below moved from 10 at semester to 8 at the end of quarter 3, this fell short of the 40% reduction goal. Perception data collected using a the Domain Specific Hope Scale (Sympson, 1999) indicates a slight increase in academic hope, from a pre-test average of 30 points to a post-test average of 37 (scores can range from 8 to 64). Upon reflecting on the limited success of the intervention, the counselors believe that the individual counseling sessions should either extend through the entire second semester, or be delivered during quarter two with intermittent follow up second semester. Additional considerations include supplementing the existing Academic Support small group that focuses on skill building with the social/emotional focus on the hope intervention and including a greater number of special education students in the group. Moreover, discussions are ongoing as to how family buy-in can be increased and families efforts more fully supported by staff of South Junior High. Nevertheless, taken in total, the larger Closing the Gap goal was successfully met, going from 30 male students on I.E.P.s earning a GPA of 2.0 or below in 15-16 school year to 22 for the 16-17 school year.

Goal: Closing the Gap Goal: By June 2, 2017, the number of male students receiving special education services in grades 7th through 9th who earn a GPA of 2.0 or below will decrease by 25% from 30 (2015-2016) to 22 students (2016-2017). Results Report Goal: By March 24, 2017, the number of 8th grade male students receiving special education services who have earned a GPA of 2.0 or below will decrease by 40% from 10 (end of Semester one) to 6 (end of Quarter three).

Target Group: 8th grade male students receiving special education services who earned a GPA of 2.0 or below at the end of semester one of the 16-17 school year.

Data Used to Identify Students: Academic summary chart was developed using semester one report cards for the 16-17 school year.

School Counselor(s): Lane

ASCA Domain, Mindsets & Behaviors Standard(s): Academic M2 B-LS 4

Type of Activities to be Delivered in What Manner?: Individual counseling sessions, N = 8 1 - Pre-Test + Relationship building 2. Clarifying goals 3. Self Exploration 4. Core beliefs / Positive experiences 5 - Positive experiences part 2 6 - Agency building / Pathway development 7 - Healthy Mind / Wellbeing 8 - Progress review / Post Survey Weekly parent phone calls with student. Missing assignment incentive plan.

Process Data (Number of students affected): 10

Perception Data (Surveys or assessments used): Academic Domain “Hope Score” Average Pre - 30 Average Post - 37 (Scores can range from minimum of 8 to maximum of 64)

Outcome Data (Achievement, attendance, and/or behavior data): The number of 8th grade male students receiving special education services who earned a GPA of 2.0 or below decreased by 20% from 10 to 8 at the end of Quarter 3. The number of male students receiving special education services in grades 7th through 9th who earn a GPA of 2.0 or below decreased by 25% from 30 (2015-2016) to 22 students (2016-2017).

Implications: Results report goal was not met. Perception data indicates that students showed a small increase in levels of academic hope. Although we are glad that outcome data shows a 20% reduction in the number of students who failed to meet GPA graduation requirements, it is disappointing that students did not respond better to the interventions. Results could have improved with more individual sessions across the entire second semester. Weekly phone calls with parents resulted in improved relationships but less than hoped for support from home. Missing assignment incentive plan of a “lunch of your choosing” day for anyone without any missing assignments at the end of quarter 3 seems to have only been effective for a couple of students. While the counselors believe the Hope Scale is an effective means of evaluating attitudes related to academic success, perhaps a simplified version should have been used with a more traditional 1-4 or 1-5 scaling system. Materials gathered for the intervention have been shared in-building and within the district, however it is unlikely that the eight individual sessions during quarter three format will be repeated. Combining elements of our Academic Support small group with the social/emotional skills that were the focus of the “Hopeful Solutions” individual session outline will be considered for 17-18 year.

Attachments


PDF
Download

File
Download

File
Download

File
Download

File
Download

File
Download