Back

John J. Lukancic Middle School (2018)

Romeoville , IL

Closing the Gap

REVISED



Our closing the gap goal was defined through multiple sources of data. The counselors reviewed our school data profile, school improvement plan, and building goals. The counselors decided to use our program goals for our closing the gap. We observed the grading period one report and how we could decrease the amount of D’s and F’s in each grade specifically in math and language arts. Before the grade period one report came out, we tracked D’s and F’s through weekly eligibility reports and organized it into a Google Doc. We also found that students met the criteria of the closing the gap population were failing multiple classes. Many of the students were also our low income population.



The interventions were specifically chosen to help reduce the amount of D’s and F’s students were receiving in mathematics and language arts by the end of the school year. We chose to use academic small groups to reach more students. The students selected were those that were deemed most “at risk”. We flagged students who were failing multiple classes. Another activity included weekly grade level meetings with staff. We would take time to go over the shared spreadsheet among teachers and identify trends. Although classroom teachers were in communication with parents we could communicate to parents that their student was failing multiple classes and communicate this in detail. Warning cards were passed out to those students to increase communication about their grades. Students would have to create a plan on the back of the card on how they would increase their grades and meet with the school counselor. Teachers would also bring up students of concern backed by data for a problem solving team meeting. The school counselors would then set up a meeting and track data and interventions. The interventions would be separated by ELA and math. Rather than silent reading or computer time for math students would receive targeted lessons for deficient skills in ELA or math.



The data results will help deliver interventions/activities more effectively in the future. We reflected on our perception data and agree we need stronger perception data questions. This will help us collect data more accurately in the future and ensure quality. We felt that it was necessary to collect more perception data as well. We gained ours solely through the academic small groups which showcased our most at need population of students. We considered holding parent meetings for those students and inform them on strategies they could use at home.



What we noticed in the data is that there was a higher amount of D’s and F’s in math compared to ELA. According to our data profile this was true for the year prior as well. We also noticed that the students who were originally on the grade period one report struggled getting off of the eligibility lists and would continue to be on the grade reports throughout the year. We are aiming to change this population by giving them the tools and strategies necessary to see success and not be overlooked. The successful outcome we are looking for is to see a significant decrease in the amount of D’s and F’s from the beginning of the year to the end and for our students to build confidence and see less stress because of the strategies we have taught them..





We carefully selected specific mindsets and behaviors that reflected our goals. The first was M6, which is a positive attitude toward work and learning once students develop a growth mindset rather than a fixed about their grades they will open up many doors to their success. Another was B-LS3 which is the use of time-management, organizational and study skills. Often times students are unable to identify proper studying mechanics, as well as a time-management system. We address this more through our small group sessions by filling out a time management template. Our department also wanted to foster self-motivation and initiative. That is why we selected B-LS.4 which is to apply self-motivation and self-direction to learning.



Our department would like to add to our list of interventions so we have an assortment to choose from. We have also considered moving toward an electronic approach to the academic warning cards due to finding the cards throughout the hallways and students not completing the solutions portion. We feel that through google classroom we can reach more students and have them stay tuned into their grades and developing a system to stay successful.

Goal: By the end of the 2016-2017 school year, students who have received a D or F in Mathematics will decrease by 20% the total amount from 134 to 107. By the end of the 2016-2017 school year, students who have received a D or F in Language Arts will decrease the total amount by 20% from 23 to 18.

Target Group: 134 sixth to eighth grade students receiving a D or F in Mathematics at the end of grading period one And 23 sixth to eighth grade students receiving a D or F in Language Arts at the end of grading period one during the 2016-2017 school year.

Data Used to Identify Students: Academic data found from the end of Grading Period One.

School Counselor(s): Felicia Coster and Sara Dahms

ASCA Domain, Mindsets & Behaviors Standard(s): M6., B-LS.3., B-LS.4., B-LS.7., B-SMS.3

Type of Activities to be Delivered in What Manner?: 1. Academic Small Groups 6-8th Grade 2. Department Meeting Data reflection of students in targeted group 3. Parent Phone Calls Home and Emails 4. Academic Warnings passed out to students weekly 5. Problem Solving Team meetings for select students in targeted groups 6. Before School/After School tutoring for select students in the targeted group

Process Data (Number of students affected): 134 sixth to eighth grade students receiving a D or F in Mathematics at the end of grading period one for the 2016-2017 school year. And 23 sixth to eighth grade students receiving a D or F in Language Arts at the end of grading period one during the 2016-2017 school year.

Perception Data (Surveys or assessments used): Academic Pre-Assessments and Post-Assessments.

Outcome Data (Achievement, attendance, and/or behavior data): By the end of the 2016-2017 school year students who received a D or F in Mathematics decreased from 134 to 64 rather than our 20% goal of 107. By the end of the 2016-2017 school year students who received a D or F in Language Arts decreased from 23 to 5 rather than our 20% goal of 18.

Implications: We reflected on the purpose of implementing the ASCA model, to show our impact on our students. Through our goals we were able to show our impact. We knew we wanted to better align our department goals with our building goals and decided with administration that these goals would fit best. We agreed we would like to see more interventions being used in the future and to find a way of tracking their effectiveness. We also wanted to gain more feedback and input from teachers and students during the process rather than relying on just weekly D/F reports. We also wanted to celebrate more which would support Mindset 6. having a positive attitude towards work and learning. We weren't sure of the Academic Warning being passed out each week, often times we would find them on the ground throughout the hallways or they would be misplaced instead of bringing them to the counselor. We are considering using Google next year rather than the note cards.

Attachments


Word
Download

Word
Download

PDF
Download

Word
Download

Word
Download

Word
Download