Back

Soldotna High School (2017)

Soldotna, AK

Small Group Responsive Services

Small-Group Responsive Services Narrative:



Before the 2016-2017 year started, the counselors from Soldotna High School met with the ninth grade Counselor, along with administrators from both buildings. Based on how many students were below six credits, (see 10.3) counselors decided there needed to be interventions for this 10th grade cohort. Students identified by not being on track to graduate were placed into small group classrooms with four core teachers, subsequently referred to as CORE 4. Data for this intervention came from counselor recommendations from the ninth grade school, along with a behind on credits report (see 10.3).



To determine the needs of these credit deficient sophomores, a counselor went into the CORE 4 classrooms and had them complete a needs based survey. (see 10.4) This survey is what motivated the counselors to create a group based on anxiety management. After the survey was completed and the results compiled, a counselor sent out invitations to students who said they wanted to be a part of this group. While thirty students had said they wanted to be in a group about anxiety, only twelve of the thirty invited 10th graders attended the group for the first two sessions. The group’s attendance subsequently dwindled to 8 sophomores.



The Anxiety group was selected as an intervention because it would give counselors access to a group of 10th grade students who had identified anxiety as affecting their school performance. Group session topics were determined based on the initial group survey results (see 10.6). The content in the lessons centered around Mindset 1, belief in development of whole self, including a healthy balance of mental, social/emotional and physical well-being, and Mindset 2, self confidence in the ability to succeed. These paired with Behavior Learning Strategy 1, demonstrate critical thinking skills to make informed decisions, served as the backbone of the lessons that were presented in the group sessions. While the pre and post perception data stayed comparable, there was a slight decrease in the amount of anxiety that affected student performance (see 10.6). This, along with students stating they felt fairly comfortable reaching out for help with their anxiety demonstrates that Mindset 1, Mindset 2, and the other Behaviors that were identified, were addressed in the lessons.



While our group helped 10th graders with their overall well-being and sense of belonging, which is Mindset #1 in the American School Counselor Association (ASCA) Mindsets and Behaviors, counselors were not able to accomplish getting these 10th graders on track to graduate at a higher rate (see 10.6). While the group did provide students coping mechanisms for dealing with their anxiety, it didn’t change their overall school performance. Looking at the outcome data, the counselors discussed multiple changes for this group next year. First, the counselors felt that they each should have run a group individually, with once a week meetings, to reach a larger group of identified students. The biggest change was that the counselors recognized that the goal that they focused on, improving 10th graders on track to graduate, was an academic goal, but they instead focused on a social/emotional intervention. While they felt this would increase the students sense of belonging and improve academic performance, they felt that the group should have been focused on study skills, executive functioning skills, and goal setting. Counselors felt they may have had more success if the group focus was academic.



The Girls Group is a group that is run each year by both counselors. This is a group that started back in 2009, and has continued on an annual basis. The group started with recognition that there are a lot of females who struggle with body image, boundaries, and self-management skills. With recommendations from the nurse, teachers, and both counselors, this group was put into action, and girls were personally invited to attend. Topics included: developmental assets, boundaries, body image, and goal setting.



Counselors offered Girls Group once a week for 2 months during November and December. Counselors offered this group as an option for girls to sign-up, and the counselors gave out permission slips and information about group content during the first session. While eight girls showed up for the first 2 sessions, the group dwindled to 4 by the last session. The counselors spoke about increasing the number of sessions available, but also focusing on one topic for more than one week.

Group Name: Anxiety Management Group

Goal: Achievement & Attendance Goal: By May of 2017, the class of 2019 will increase the percentage of students on track to graduate by 7% from 87% to 94%.

Target Group: 10th graders who have been identified as credit deficient and not on track to graduate.

Data Used to Identify Students: Students with less than 6 credits coming into 10th grade from a Behind on Credits report.

School Counselor(s): Margaret Griffin and Erin Neisinger

ASCA Domain, Mindsets & Behaviors Standard(s): Mindsets: 1, 3, 5 Behaviors: LS1, LS4, SMS7, SS2, SS3, SS6

Outline of Group Sessions Delivered: Willard, C. (2014). Mindfulness for teen anxiety: a workbook for overcoming anxiety at home, at school, and everywhere else. Oakland, CA: Instant Help Books, An Imprint of New Harbinger Publications, Inc. Lohmann, R. C. (2015). Teen anxiety: a CBT and ACT activity resource book for helping anxious adolescents. London: Jessica Kingsley . Smartboard with computer access and speaker set-up. Handouts copied off for activities. Snacks Session 1 Introduction, Identify and Define Anxiety Session 2 Recognizing Anxiety in Your Body, Understanding Triggers Session 3 Healthy and Unhealthy Coping Mechanisms Session 4 Anxiety Log Anxiety Profile Session 5 Stress Relief Journal and Other Coping Mechanisms Session 6 Wrap up, A Helping Hand Support System

Process Data (Number of students affected): 12 at start of group, 8 at end of group.

Perception Data (Surveys or assessments used): Pre-survey results: On 1-5 scale (5 highest), average was a 3 for students feeling anxious at school. On scale of 1-5 students had an average of 3.16 for feeling like they are prepared to deal with anxiety. Students got a 2.91 for feeling comfortable to get help with anxiety. On scale of 1-5, students said they were at a 3 as far as how many factors at school contribute to their anxiety. Last, on a scale of 1-5 (5 highest) student were at an average of 4.5 for how anxiety affects their school performance. Post-survey results: On 1-5 scale (5 highest), 8 students reported an average of 3.87 for how many times they felt anxious at school. Students were at an average of 3.5 for how well they were equipped to deal with anxiety. Students got a 3.12 average for how comfortable they felt reaching out for help for their anxiety. Students were at an average of 3.75 in regards to how many factors contributed to their anxiety at school. Lastly, students were at an average of 3.37 for how anxiety affects their performance at school.

Outcome Data (Achievement, attendance, and/or behavior data): Random sampling of identified small group participants showed that average GPA for Q1 was 1.92, whereas GPA for Q2 was 1.85. Students on track to graduate only went up 1%, rather than 7% which was our second goal for our program this year. (see chart of outcome data in supporting document 10.6)

Implications: The data revealed that the anxiety group didn’t help the identified 10th graders improve their grades, or get on track to graduate, credit wise. After checking grades from Q1 to Q2 we saw that GPAs had actually gone down. Also, the goal to increase the number of students on track to graduate by 7% from 87% to 94% only went up by 1%. The Post group survey results were fairly static and stayed around the same numbers as the pre survey results, with minimal variation. While the counselors felt that it increased students sense of belonging to the school, along with their emotional well-being, the results showed that the group didn’t have a significant impact. With the goal being to improve students on track to graduate, the focus of the group should have been academic, rather than social/emotional. Also, the counselors should have run two separate groups individually to allow for larger numbers. Also, group sessions should have met weekly. Having a group based on executive functioning skills, goal setting, study habits, along with stress management tips would have been better to focus on, as this would have better served the academic focused goal, of getting credit deficient students on track to graduate.

Attachments


Word
Download

PDF
Download

Word
Download

PDF
Download

Word
Download

PDF
Download

PDF
Download

Word
Download

PDF
Download

Word
Download

PDF
Download

Word
Download

Word
Download

Word
Download

Word
Download

Word
Download

Word
Download

Word
Download

Excel
Download

Word
Download

Word
Download