Back

Sycamore Elementary School (2018)

Sugar Hill , GA

Closing the Gap

Our Closing the Gap Action Plan addressed the high number of English Language Learning students who scored in the beginning learner (level 1) category on the English Language Arts Section of the Georgia Milestones, our state standardized assessment. This goal aligns with the Sycamore Elementary Local School Plan for Improvement to improve scores on the Georgia Milestones Assessment, specifically in the area of English Language Arts. When the data was disaggregated further we discovered 51.6% of students who scored in the Level 1 range were English Learner students, while only 31% of the total student population are English Language learners. This shows a significant gap in achievement of the students in this sub group. Additionally, students who scored in the Level 1 range are identified as performing below grade level and will be considered for retention. Retention can have many negative socio-emotional implications and while this is an issue for all students who score in the level 1 category, this would further put our English Learners at a disadvantage perpetuating the achievement gap.



Our Closing the Gap action plan outlines a Multi-Tiered System of supports that targets both our total school population of students taking the Georgia Milestones as well as those specific students who scored a Level 1 and our English Learners who were at a Level 1. At Tier 1, our goal was to engage all 3rd-5th grade students in this level of intervention. Thus, all 3rd-5th grade students received specific classroom lessons on test taking strategies and stress coping. We also held a test taking pep rally for all 3rd-5th grade students to promote confidence and decrease anxiety around the Georgia Milestones.



Tier 2, we sent a parent informational flyer about the Georgia Milestones and ways parents could help prepare their child. This flyer was sent home to all English Language Learner Students in 3rd-5th grades, regardless of their previous year’s scores on the Georgia Milestones. The flyer went home in both English and Spanish and gave helpful information about studying for the test, what was on the test, and how to help students prepare both academically and mentally to take the assessment.



Tier 3 interventions were three fold. The first intervention began at the beginning of the 2017-2018 school year as a School Success Small Group that focused on goal setting, attendance, self-confidence, and academic skills was conducted for all Level 1 students. The identified EL students were again involved in a “Testing Taking Boot Camp” Small Group held the six weeks preceding the assessment. This group was specifically for the EL students who were at a Level 1 and focused on skills specific to taking the test. The final intervention in this tier was a parent information session held in English and Spanish for the parents of these students.



The interventions at each tier were chosen to specifically address both academic and personal (confidence, anxiety, self-esteem) barriers that influence a student’s ability to be successful. Additionally, with the incorporation of parent informational flyers and sessions, we aimed to increase this populations of parents engagement in school, giving the students additional interventions outside the building as well.



We chose the activities for Classroom Counseling, Small Group sessions, student pep rally, and parent communication/ workshop through the lens of Adlerian Counseling theory. We were working on building social interest through our multi-tiered approach. We were diligent to ensure that our students and their parents had opportunities and experiences to instill that they are connected, capable, and they contribute to Sycamore Elementary School community. In conjunction with equipping our students and parents with the skills necessary to achieve, we shifted their attitude towards school and learning to one of belonging and belief in oneself.



The data and results will help us to deliver the intervention more efficiently in the future by gaining more teacher input into skills taught in small groups so they will be geared to the specific test we are preparing for. Additionally, having this information and working with our parent center liaisons to help prepare parents for helping their children with more specific content. After reflecting on the results, it was evident that the majority of students in targeted interventions reached level 2 or higher. However, the total number of level 1 students in the school did not decrease as significantly. This is likely due to a transient population. Finding ways to identify and reach these new arriving students is necessary in our effort to close the achievement gap.

Goal: By May 2018 10% of English Language Learner students who performed in the level 1 (beginning learner) range on the 2017 English Language Arts (ELA) Georgia Milestones will increase scoring by one performance level (to a level 2, developing learning) from the 2017 ELA GA Milestones to the 2018 ELA Georgia Milestones. Data Based on Georgia Milestones Assessment Results.

Target Group: English Language Learner students who scored in the level 1 range on the 2017 English Language Arts Georgia Milestones Assessment

Data Used to Identify Students: 2017 English Language Arts Georgia Milestones Assessment

School Counselor(s): Nicole Moody and Jen Soloff

ASCA Domain, Mindsets & Behaviors Standard(s): M:2 M:5 BLS: 4 BSS2 BSMS: 6

Type of Activities to be Delivered in What Manner?: 1) School Success Groups for ELA level 1 Milestones Students 2) Testing Boot Camp for ELA students who scored level 1 in previous Year 3) Test Prep Classroom Lessons 4th grade 4) Test Prep Classroom Lessons 5th grade 5) Test Taking Parent Information Session 6) Test Taking Pep Rally 7) Test Taking Strategies Parent Tip Sheet

Process Data (Number of students affected): 21 targeted EL students who scored level 1 on the 2017 ELA GA Milestones (tier 3) 46 students total students scored level 1 (tier 2) (interventions were delivered in a 3 tier approach, so a total of 360 students were impacted by interventions at varying tiers)

Perception Data (Surveys or assessments used): 1) School Success Groups: Perception data gathered from pre and post assessments reveals that students increased their knowledge, skills and attitudes in reducing testing anxiety and feel more confident in their ability to take tests. On the Student Engagement Inventory, of the initial 46 students, 1 withdrew. 36 students all showed an improved score in the Intrinsic Motivation domain, with an average of 3 points (34%) improvement. For the remaining 9 students, there was no correlating scores due to absences and only 1 student did not show any change in the measure of intrinsic motivation. 2) Testing Boot Camp:Perception data gathered from pre and post assessments show that students increased their knowledge, skills, and attitudes regarding test taking strategies, feelings of confidence in self, and ability to deal with testing related nervousness and ability to calm down. Students reported minimal improvement in knowledge of how to take a standardized test. Additionally they showed no growth in the area of knowledge of how to prepare for standardized test. On the Student Engagement Inventory, 14 of 21 students showed an improved score in the Intrinsic Motivation domain, with an average of 2 points (60%) improvement. For the remaining 7 students, there was no correlating scores due to absences. 3) Test Prep lesson 4th: Perception data gathered from pre and post assessments show that students increased their knowledge, skills, and attitudes in the area of knowing calming strategies and using routines. The fourth grade showed a significant increase in test taking strategies. 4) Test Prep Lessons 5th:Perception data gathered from pre and post assessments show that students increased their knowledge, skills, and attitudes in the area of knowing calming strategies and using routines. The 5th grades knowledge of testing strategies decreased from pre-post test with only 25.6% of students feeling knowledgeable in this area.

Outcome Data (Achievement, attendance, and/or behavior data): 11 of 21 (53%) targeted EL students improved their ELA Milestones score from a level 1 in 2017 to a level 2 or higher in 2018. This closing the gap goal of improvement by 10% of students was surpassed. 20 of 46 students (43%)improved their ELA Milestones score from a level 1 in 2017 to a level 2 or higher in 2018. Total number of level one scores by the 4th and 5th grade cohorts of students on the 2017 ELA test was 54. On the 2018 test, 51 students scored in the level 1 range. This reflects a -5.5 percent change. Showing positive effects of this intervention on a global front

Implications: Both our perception and outcome data shows that our interventions were highly successful. Due to this, we plan to Continue to facilitate groups for all students in the level 1 range. Due to the focus and time of year, consider having booster session closer to test giving timeframe. In regards to testing boot camp, we will Continue to facilitate this test taking boot camp type group directly preceding the state test administration. However, more focus is needed on the areas of test preparation (studying, ect) as well as information regarding how to specifically take the GA Milestones test. As there is a lot of push to cover basic test taking strategies, the need to focus more on the preparation for this specific test is evident. This could lead to potentially collaborating with a subject area classroom teacher to help with the facilitation of these last two parts. When considering classroom counseling lessons and testing pep rally, we will continue to use these interventions and focus more heavily on testing strategies as data shows that students have a good grasp on test stress but are still learning test taking strategies and skills. In regards to our parent outreach, we will continue to host events and send information to get students motivated about testing, considering how to gather more specific data regarding the perception of this event from teachers and students. The total number of level 1 students in the school did not decrease as significantly as the EL targeted group. We will work to find ways to identify and reach these unidentified and new arriving students is necessary in our effort to close the achievement gap.

Attachments


Word
Download

Word
Download

Word
Download

Word
Download

Word
Download

Word
Download

Word
Download