Back

Carole Highlands Elementary Sc (2019)

Takoma Park , MD

Small Group Responsive Services

REVISED SECTION

The Implications section of the Results Report and the Small Group Narrative have been revised to respond to reviewer suggestions.



Small groups were identified during the Summer 2017 School Program Management Team (SPMT) meeting where we reviewed academic progress, attendance data, and PBIS behavior referrals from 2016-2017. We discussed where I could have the greatest impact on our school’s performance. (Attached is the Carole Highlands MSDE 2017-2018 Report Card.) We noticed that students in 2nd, 4th, and 5th grades lacked study skills and a growth mindset. Second grade, 4th and 5th graders reading and writing comprehension grades and English Language Proficiency scores were below grade level. We identified students, who would benefit from small group work; six groups were identified. Three groups were identified to address study skills: 2nd grade group; 4th grade group; and a 5th grade group. One group was established to address 4th grade attendance issue. One group was identified for 4th and 5th grade students based on PBIS bullying referrals, and another group was established to address 6th grade girls’ relationship/friendship issues.



The following research-based materials were used for the three study skills groups: Step Up to Better Grades by R. S. Zorn, Studying Test Taking and Getting Good Grades (Palomores & Schilling). Ready to Use Self Esteem and Conflict Solving Activities (B.Toelis) was used for the 4th grade attendance group. I collected perception data from students and parents, monitored homework completion, and test scores. I added topics to increase knowledge and practice to prepare for state assessments. Student grade point average in English oral and written skills increased by average of one letter grade. In the future, I would increase the 8 sessions to 10 sessions to allow for more practice.



In 2017-2018, I selected four sixth grade girls who exhibited relational aggression behaviors for a small group. The girls I identified for the group had a total of 12 referrals. They called other students names in Spanish and English. The girls manipulated relationships, spreading rumors, putdowns, teasing, and aggressive body language.



Two of the girls came to the United States to live with their parent after living with their grandmother. The girls lacked self-esteem and displayed aggression towards their younger siblings and other students. The parent depended on them to take care of their young siblings and perform parenting household duties. The girls were angry and their parents were unresponsive to requests from teachers and administrators to meet to address their bullying behaviors. The other two students were selected because the family dynamics changed drastically resulting in them being transferred to our school.



I identified the following M&B’s to address the goals for the girls group: M 1: Belief in the development of themselves. Students needed the ability to make healthy friendships. The small group activities and lessons enabled them to B-SS 2 to build positive and supportive relationships with other students, and B-SMS 2 demonstrate self-discipline and self-control. Students were exhibiting the “mean behaviors. “Participation in discussions and working to change relational aggression beliefs and behaviors within peer groups will help decrease the negativity that relational difficulties play in relationships (Brown et al., 1999 p435-450). The girls bullying behaviors decreased from 12 bullying referrals in 2016-2017 to six referrals for a 50% decrease.



Small group counseling helped to build positive relationships. The girls learned how to manage challenging situations and cope by recognizing their triggers. The post perception survey revealed there was an increase of 147% of having and using coping skills, and strategies. Researchers (Crick et al., 1996 p22-23) explains “relational aggression can take many forms such as malicious gossip, spreading rumors, lies, and threats to withdraw friendships etc.” The girls in my group needed to learn the difference between aggression and assertiveness. Although, the girls’ ability to talk to others about feelings and ask for help increased by 43%, students continued to have difficulty finding trusting adults to support them other than myself and our Social Services’ community resource advocate. In the future I will increase lessons that cover practicing role-playing scenarios that focuses on empathy. I will include journaling activities. I will add the perception survey questions: Would you participate in an afterschool activity? or volunteer to read to young students? In addition, I continue to monitor the girls’ behavior with teachers and parents. I changed the girls’ check-ins from weekly to monthly. I host a monthly lunch-bunch pizza party to provide support to the girls to assist with transition into their middle school feeder school.











Group Name: Girls Healthy Relational Friendship

Goal: Girls will learn how to use acquired strategies to manage relationship challenges.

Target Group: (4) Six grade girls

Data Used to Identify Students: Positive Behavior Intervention and Supports (PBIS) Bullying Referrals.

School Counselor(s): Cassandra Thomas

ASCA Domain, Mindsets & Behaviors Standard(s): Social/Emotional Domain M 1 Behavior Standards B-SMS 2 B-SS 2 B-SS 9

Outline of Group Sessions Delivered: December 18, 2017 - Session One: Introduction, General Goals and Objectives. January 8, 2018 - Session Two: Group Building Exercise and Relational Aggression. January 22, 2018 - Session Three: Girls will be able to define relational aggression. February 5, 2018 - Session Four: Role playing and active learning. February 26, 2018 - Session Five: Developing healthy friendship qualities. March 12, 2018 - Session Six: Treating others with respect. March 27, 2018 - Session Seven: How people respond to me. March 29, 2018 - Session Eight: Healthy social emotional behaviors.

Process Data (Number of students affected): (4) Six Grade Girls 8 Sessions Bi-Weekly 45 minutes/session

Perception Data (Surveys or assessments used): Likert Scale Pre and Post Assessment Responses 1=Disagree 2=Unsure 3=Agree 1. Know how to manage challenges, diifficult people or situations Pre: 1.50 Post: 2.50 66% Increase 2. Identify ways to cope with challenges or difficult situations Pre: 1.20 Post:2.75 120% Increase 3. Abillity to talk to others aboout feelings Pre: 1.0 Posr: 2.75 175% Increase 4. People that can support me Pre: 2.0 Post: 2.25 12.5% Increase 5. Ability to ask for help Pre: 2.0 Post: 2.50 43% Increase Both teachers observation and student self-report revealed a decrease in anxiety, anger and coping strategies learned manage triggers. Students identified as well as aa anger management strategies being practiced.

Outcome Data (Achievement, attendance, and/or behavior data): Data comparison: 2016-2017 12 Bullying Referrals 2017-2018 6 Bullying Referrals This was a decrease of 50%.

Implications: REVISED SECTION The Results Report has been updated to respond to reviewer suggestions. In response to the feedback concerning how the implications were effective and how data results help, I offer this explanation. The 6th grade students’ attitudes towards their siblings and classmates positive as well as supportive. Teachers shared, students learned to listen, did not interrupt with negative comments in class, displaying self-discipline and self-control. In addressing the reviewer’s question about how data can be collected and future of the group, I will include questions about gang activity in their neighborhood. In reply to: how I will deliver the group more effectively by revising the perception survey for the future. The perception survey will include students’ attitude towards authority and their parents along with cultural beliefs. In session five, Developing Healthy Friendships, the students’ activity what are characteristics of a friendship led into a discussion about the difference between gang membership and friendship. I will include a question concerning gangs. Addressing the question, how I made the decision to discontinue the girls small group was determined from there were no behavior referrals from January 2018 – March 2018. The six behavior referrals were from September – December of 2017. Also, the students identified their challenges and teachers reported that they strategies were being implemented with their classmates as well as siblings. The Six Grade Girls Relational Friendship small group responsive service was successful in changing students' ability to manage challenges in difficult situations with people and using appropriate coping skills. The interventions provided strategies needed in difficult situations and scores went from 1.20 to 2.75. Students identified similarities and uniqueness to others. Their shared experiences gave them the ability to connect with others and discuss their feelings from 1.0 to 2.75 for an average of 175%. The girls had difficult family lives with parent type responsibilities. Research shows FARM students strength is their perseverance and willingness to protect their siblings at all costs. (D. Lanesskog, Taylor & Francis). Students felt overwhelmed with family responsibilities. Perception survey concerning support increased to only 12.5%. The girls’ definition of support is having someone to share their family responsibilities. To address this concern, students were given resources to meet basic family needs from Transition Neighborhood Initiative Community Resource Advocate (CRA). Students learned to ask for help. Passes are available to students. Also, students were given PBIS : "Eagle Bucks" rewards that are used to purchase items from the school store for their improved behavior. Teachers and I will continue to monitor their behavior monthly with check-ins..

Attachments


Word
Download

Word
Download

Excel
Download

Excel
Download

PDF
Download

Word
Download